National Finance Corporation – Mortgage Broker

April 12, 2011

Home Loans to 100% LVR

Filed under: mortgage broker,mortgage insurance — warrenschrodter @ 6:13 pm

One of Brisbane’s leading mortgage management companies, Barnes Home Loans is able to offer home loans to approved applicants to just under 100% Loan Valuation Ratio (LVR).

This table is a summary of how we achieve this –

Purchase Price $620,000
Deposit – 5% $31,000
Lenders Mortgage Insurance Capitalised $18,475
Total Loan $607,475
Plus Secured Visa at Home Loan Interest Rate $12,500
Total Borrowings $619,875
End LVR 99.98%

Call Warren Schrodter to find out if you qualify on 07 3356 8132 or email warren@schrodter.com.au . Warren Schrodter has been a mortgage broker since 1997 and knows how to achieve this results. The average Australian Bank now will only consider to 97% LVR in some cases.

September 17, 2010

NFC Mortgage Broker Special Offer

Filed under: Bank,mortgage broker,National Finance Corporation,NFC,Special Offer — warrenschrodter @ 11:12 pm

I have received confirmation this week from one of Australia’s top 3 mortgage lending banks that I can offer a greater discount on Professional Package loans than what is advertised. In Australia there are somewhere between 11,000 and 13,000 mortgage brokers registered and this special offer is only available to a select few hundred brokers nationally.

Not all Mortgage Brokers are the same. Banks now reward Mortgage Brokers that have superior expertise and submit quality applications.

For a limited time, we can offer a standard variable interest rate discount of 0.8%. Loan valuation ratio and loan limits apply so please call NFC now on 1300 663 632 or email info@nfc.com.au for more details.

March 31, 2010

Mortgage Broker Training

Filed under: CBA,Lending Policy,mortgage broker,refund home loans,Westpac — warrenschrodter @ 9:58 pm

Further to my article yesterday regarding mortgage brokers Refund Home Loans, I would like to also highlight that the issue of recruiting non-finance background people has been quite common. As rightly commented on the article, buyer beware! Buyers have certainly become much more aware about banking and finance and general lending principles over the last 10 years. There is more education out there however the media are still missing the boat in what to report to truly help consumers. I will cover more about this on my next post.

Recruitment of mortgage brokers and bank staff alike has probably lacked some quality during recent years. I know when I worked at a major Australian Bank, one of the managers was employed from outside banking and quickly given authority to approve home loans with little experience. When Aussie Home Loans first came to the market I found a significant portion of their consultants were from unrelated backgrounds. I also use to conduct training sessions for existing and new brokers at a government accredited training course and for aggregators Australian Finance Group (AFG), Northern City Finance (now First Chartered) and various smaller groups. I know how difficult the transaction was after 11 years in banking to become a proficient mortgage broker.

So what is the point here? Broker training has been lacking as it has in Australian banking. What always reminds me of this is a lady that went to auction based on a so called pre-approval to attend an auction from lets say Apac? She was successful at auction on a 30 day settlement contract here in Queensland. I met this lady around day 14 into the 30 day contract in tears that Apac had declined her loan because they didn’t factor into account that her income was casual. The conditional approval clearly states subject to the banks final approval so who is responsible? Technically the borrower so again be very aware. Moral obligation? Well I think that is pretty clear but the banks generally will not recognise this. I fortunately was able to set this application with another major bank but the lesson was clear. Reliability of the mortgage finance industry is clearly dependant on the person you engage whether it is bank employee or mortgage broker. I have many more examples of this to come over the following months.

The answer? No definitive answer or advice to give but I can provide some leading questions before you decide –

  • Time in industry
  • Background prior to current role
  • Investment and property experience
  • Provide detailed summary of what you initially think you need and await a response. The response probably says more than all the points above.

As you are spilling all to obtain your loan, a true finance professional will have no problem in sharing with you the points I have raised above. You need a mortgage broker that can provide quality information and responses that make sense. If they do not, then obtain a second opinion.

March 30, 2010

Refund Home Loans Television Advertisement

In March 2010, I recall seeing Refund Home Loans on The Today Show and Kerri-Anne. Apart from obviously advertising the brand, what concerned me was the way they publicly acknowledge they recruit people to become mortgage brokers that have no real financial or banking experience. In 2010 all mortgage brokers need to apply for a new licence from ASIC to continue to trade or enter the industry. In this process, ASIC consider training, experience, compliance and background of all applicants. In my view, this appears to be a last minute recruitment drive prior to licensing taking effect. I welcome the new licensing regime as in theory it will improve the standard and quality of true mortgage broker professionals.

I believe that everyone deserves an opportunity to become a mortgage broker. However, I still have grave concerns about any organisation that recruits from outside the industry sends them on a 2 or 4 week training course then sets them loose on the public. Bear in mind that we are dealing with your money and have a large role in the success or failure of your new purchase. If I wanted to become a builder tomorrow I would have to do a 4 year apprenticeship. Since commencing in banking in 1986 I bear some frustration in the previous lack of minimum entry standards that are within our mortgage broking industry.

An example I saw of this 2 weeks ago is yet another example of an inexperienced mortgage broker almost shattering the dreams of a home owner. Commonwealth Bank and Westpac had declined the loan application to purchase a home in Brisbane for around 750K. A loan amount of 90% of the purchase was sought with mortgage insurance (LMI) to be capitalised (see more on LMI at Mortgage Insurance Australia). Due to the tightening of lending policy in Australia after the fallout of the GFC during 2009, I could easily see the issue CBA and Westpac may have had. By understanding the tightening these banks have had, I simply went back to grass roots mortgage broking by checking LMI qualification and confirming details with connections I have with the mortgage insurers. The loan qualified with the mortgage insurers so we simply selected a lender that would accept the LMI qualification. If it wasn’t for the fact we knew the process and the real estate agent knew we could solve the issue, this purchaser would have missed out on buying her new home.

I should say at this point that CBA and Westpac have generally been in our top 3 lenders for several years but since the GFC they are always not the answer. Interest rates and fees are vitally important but getting the loan for the home of your dreams is even more important. The non-bank and secondary bank lenders have been hammered since the commencement of the GFC but now they have emerged with market competiveness not on price but on policy and servicing levels.

My parting words of advice are always to check the experience and quality of your mortgage broker. This also applies to people that still deal with a bank directly. The consumer is much more aware of this today I believe so if unsure get a second opinion. It may just save you!

Theme: Rubric. Clone this site at WordPress.com

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.